Woo! New site is online - select here to use it!


Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

12 Angry Men - Anybody Recognise Themselves??

Reply
Created by cisco > 9 months ago, 13 May 2012
cisco
QLD, 12365 posts
13 May 2012 10:27PM
Thumbs Up

Two great movies. The 1957 original and the 40 year later remake.

In 2007, 12 Angry Men was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".



GPA
WA, 2529 posts
14 May 2012 1:59AM
Thumbs Up

Def worth watching. I had to watch it (1997 ver) as part of my management studies... and write a summary. Something along the lines of one person can influence/change the views of many - even when those views are seemingly already set.

99% of the film takes place in that one jurors room - and although there is no music, it holds your interest to the end.

I picked up a copy from JB Hi Fi for about $12...

oz surf
WA, 407 posts
14 May 2012 9:33AM
Thumbs Up

Only seen the 1957 film. But up there with one of the best movies i've ever seen.

cisco
QLD, 12365 posts
14 May 2012 2:39PM
Thumbs Up

I think the 1997 screen play is as good as the earlier because it very subtly adds the racial dimension.

pweedas
WA, 4642 posts
14 May 2012 1:01PM
Thumbs Up

How do you measiure the racial dimension? length?, volume?, density,?
Is that in imperial or metric?

cisco
QLD, 12365 posts
14 May 2012 3:03PM
Thumbs Up

Shall we say issue then??

pweedas
WA, 4642 posts
14 May 2012 1:08PM
Thumbs Up

eewwww! Preferably not!
Oh,.. you mean,..

myusernam
QLD, 6160 posts
18 May 2012 2:13PM
Thumbs Up

so watch the latest one (if you only had to watch one)?

cisco
QLD, 12365 posts
19 May 2012 12:04AM
Thumbs Up

Yes. I watched that one first.

myusernam
QLD, 6160 posts
23 May 2012 12:29PM
Thumbs Up

watched it. was pretty good. Watched the old one. When you say the new one 'subtly added the race dimension'? I dont get it. The old one was all about race too - the second last juror to fold was the racist one. It seemed (i skip watched the new one afterwards) was a carbon copy of the first.

cisco
QLD, 12365 posts
24 May 2012 12:15AM
Thumbs Up

myusernam said...

watched it. was pretty good. Watched the old one. When you say the new one 'subtly added the race dimension'? I dont get it. The old one was all about race too - the second last juror to fold was the racist one. It seemed (i skip watched the new one afterwards) was a carbon copy of the first.


Yes the screenplay and dialogue was ALMOST identical.

Re:-When you say the new one 'subtly added the race dimension'? I dont get it.

Come on mate. I have to spell it out for you don't I?

In the 1997 version there were 4 black guys, two latinos and one very Italian guy.

I watched both versions full.

You said (i skip watched the new one afterwards).

For such a great story and what I said in the original post:-

Two great movies. The 1957 original and the 40 year later remake.

In 2007, 12 Angry Men was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".


Skip watching either of them is just intellectual laziness.

However I must compliment you in that you did watch one of them completely and scanned the other.

That is 100 times the attention span that 90% of Seabreezers have.

myusernam
QLD, 6160 posts
24 May 2012 1:37PM
Thumbs Up

cisco said...

myusernam said...

watched it. was pretty good. Watched the old one. When you say the new one 'subtly added the race dimension'? I dont get it. The old one was all about race too - the second last juror to fold was the racist one. It seemed (i skip watched the new one afterwards) was a carbon copy of the first.


Yes the screenplay and dialogue was ALMOST identical.

Re:-When you say the new one 'subtly added the race dimension'? I dont get it.

Come on mate. I have to spell it out for you don't I?

In the 1997 version there were 4 black guys, two latinos and one very Italian guy.

I watched both versions full.

You said (i skip watched the new one afterwards).

For such a great story and what I said in the original post:-

Two great movies. The 1957 original and the 40 year later remake.

In 2007, 12 Angry Men was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".


Skip watching either of them is just intellectual laziness.

However I must compliment you in that you did watch one of them completely and scanned the other.

That is 100 times the attention span that 90% of Seabreezers have.



i think that was just casting - some black dudes go the part. they were still racist towards the defendant? In the origional the second last juror was blinded by race. It was the same in the later movie also?, even though old mate was black he was racist towards the spic



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"12 Angry Men - Anybody Recognise Themselves??" started by cisco