Woo! New site is online - select here to use it!


Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

Carbon redistribution thing (not tax)

Reply
Created by ginger pom > 9 months ago, 31 May 2011
ginger pom
VIC, 1746 posts
31 May 2011 8:36PM
Thumbs Up

What if Carbon was charged but then all the money collected was shared back evenly to every ATN holder...? So you'd only really pay if you used more than average....

Would everyone be as angry about it then?

It wouldn't be Gillard, Rangas, Big government, rich celebrities or scientists, it would just be a way of getting Australia a little bit more used to the idea that power might cost more in the future - in a slow way that means we could change gradually....

You wouldn't even need to believe in global warming, climate change and all the stuff that people who study the weather for a living bang on about.

You could do it because you thought that relying on Arabs for oil wasn't a good idea.

bjw
QLD, 3691 posts
31 May 2011 8:42PM
Thumbs Up

I smell the proverbial carbon fight about to begin.

mineral1
WA, 4564 posts
31 May 2011 6:51PM
Thumbs Up

No to any bloody carbon tax, no matter which shonky mob put it, or anything like it up!
This and is one time I side with Andrew Bolt from News ltd and Ch10 on this issue

SandS
VIC, 5904 posts
31 May 2011 9:36PM
Thumbs Up

ginger pom said...

What if Carbon was charged but then all the money collected was shared back evenly to every ATN holder...? So you'd only really pay if you used more than average....

Would everyone be as angry about it then?

It wouldn't be Gillard, Rangas, Big government, rich celebrities or scientists, it would just be a way of getting Australia a little bit more used to the idea that power might cost more in the future - in a slow way that means we could change gradually....

You wouldn't even need to believe in global warming, climate change and all the stuff that people who study the weather for a living bang on about.

You could do it because you thought that relying on Arabs for oil wasn't a good idea.


the cost to administer the taking and the giving back would be horry-endis!

swap every light globe in the western world for a LED and we would do better.

Mobydisc
NSW, 9029 posts
31 May 2011 10:35PM
Thumbs Up

Wouldn't it be simpler and cheaper not to have any tax or redistribution of income? It seems a bit silly to take with one hand and then give with the other. All it will do is make Australia an even more expensive place to live.

slainte
QLD, 2246 posts
1 Jun 2011 6:23PM
Thumbs Up

Mobydisc said...

Wouldn't it be simpler and cheaper not to have any tax or redistribution of income? It seems a bit silly to take with one hand and then give with the other. All it will do is make Australia an even more expensive place to live.




They already do, and it already is. March GDP figures down by 1.2%, another month like that and we are in recession

Gizmo
SA, 2865 posts
1 Jun 2011 6:16PM
Thumbs Up

slainte said...

They already do, and it already is. March GDP figures down by 1.2%, another month like that and we are in recession


Maybe its a recession we need to have? Might slow the Gov. down and make them think a bit.

bjw
QLD, 3691 posts
1 Jun 2011 8:49PM
Thumbs Up

Gizmo said...

slainte said...



Maybe its a recession we need to have? Might slow the Gov. down and make them think a bit.




The recession we had to have to question why we had to have this government?

Or maybe we should just give everyone 900 bucks instead of building long term infrastructure projects such as roads and green power plants. Fark a duck.

slainte
QLD, 2246 posts
1 Jun 2011 9:51PM
Thumbs Up

Gizmo said...

slainte said...

They already do, and it already is. March GDP figures down by 1.2%, another month like that and we are in recession


Maybe its a recession we need to have? Might slow the Gov. down and make them think a bit.




Is that you Paul

SomeOtherGuy
NSW, 807 posts
1 Jun 2011 10:41PM
Thumbs Up

bjw said...

Or maybe we should just give everyone 900 bucks instead of building long term infrastructure projects such as roads and green power plants. Fark a duck.


So I take it you preferred to keep the money in the bank, NOT give anyone 900 bucks of their own money back and NOT build infrastructure projects like the previous lot did?? Dark a fark.

This gummit is a long way from perfect but for mine, they're a big improvement of Little Johnny Hitler and even he'd be a HUUUUGGGGEEEELY preferable to Mad Abbott the Nuck Fnuckler.

ginger pom
VIC, 1746 posts
1 Jun 2011 11:47PM
Thumbs Up

It wouldn't be just taking it and giving it back again because there are big variances in consumption.

Cisco would get a refund cos of his smart meter. www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/General-Discussion/Chat/Queenslands-Climate-Smart-Program/

People that lived in small apartments in the middle of cities would get a refund.

People that put their daughters in small cars would get a refund www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/General-Discussion/Chat/Whats-a-good-car-for-my-18yo-daughter/?whichpage=1

People that had small families would get a refund

People that built their houses facing the right angle would get a refund www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/General-Discussion/Chat/building-a-new-house/

People that went windsurfing instead of jetskiing would get a refund


Giving people $900 back to squander on utter **** isn't going to keep the economy going either.

ps Just incidently, I think that Australia is about to have a large retail lead recession. House prices are going to drop (say 25%) as key employers cut back and the labour market cools off. If the Aussie dollar remains ridiculously high, then a lot of the big employers of 'professional workers' will send more stuff abroad (to India, to China and to the US and the UK - where wages are lower now). If the Australian government can take something out of the resources "industry" (real industry involves creating value, not digging it out and selling it) then it will lower the tax burden on other industries, allow the currency to find a realistic level and have a buffer with which to keep stuff going.

theDoctor
NSW, 5786 posts
1 Jun 2011 11:52PM
Thumbs Up



you used to seriously carry on if you were holier than thou...


time has told

you are but a tool...

a ginger one at that.



ginger pom
VIC, 1746 posts
2 Jun 2011 12:12AM
Thumbs Up

theDoctor said...



you used to seriously carry on if you were holier than thou...


time has told

you are but a tool...

a ginger one at that.






Yes, I am holier than thou and your response is both witty and considered. There is not a hint of arrogance in any of your posts.... there is nothing old or bitter about you.

I'm unticking the shooting the breeze tick box again. I have better things to do than argue with you.

theDoctor
NSW, 5786 posts
2 Jun 2011 12:18AM
Thumbs Up



but you just did....


tooled again

ginger there of

pom

busterwa
3782 posts
1 Jun 2011 11:07PM
Thumbs Up

would like to post but to intoxicated.
NO_conversation_exists



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"Carbon redistribution thing (not tax)" started by ginger pom