Trawler company fights back with science
Super-trawler operator Seafish Tasmania has released a report by six scientists who say the facts have been skewed in the debate over the controversial FV Margiris.
Experts from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, the CSIRO and the South Australian Research and Development Institute have authored a background paper on the fishery set to be trawled by the 142-metre factory ship.
They say they have written the report because the debate over the Margiris has been marred by factual errors.
"On the one hand, we have a number of politicians and protest groups making claims about the fishery based on limited knowledge and here we have a detailed rebuttal by acknowledged experts," Seafish director Gerry Geen said in a statement.
"Who should the public believe?"
The report concludes that impacts on the fishery, including localised depletion of species, are unlikely.
The Devonport-bound Margiris will trawl for a quota of 18,000 tonnes in small pelagic fisheries between Western Australia and NSW.
The scientists say the catch quota is lower than scientific guidelines and the southeast Australian marine ecosystem is less vulnerable than others to depletion.
They say the mobility of the species makes depletion less likely and the broad area of the fishery will spread the catch.
They add that historical evidence from the South Australian sardine fishery, a smaller area with a larger catch, shows no negative impact.
Opposition to the Margiris continued with the Tasmanian Greens tabling a motion opposing it in state parliament on Tuesday.
The party also tabled a petition with the signatures of more than 3000 Tasmanians.
"The clear message from every single person who signed this petition is that this 142-metre long freezer-trawler vacuum-cleaner has no place fishing in our waters," spokesman Kim Booth said.http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8519762/trawler-company-fights-back-with-science
The report concludes that impacts on the fishery, including localised depletion of species, are unlikely.
The Devonport-bound Margiris will trawl for a quota of 18,000 tonnes in small pelagic fisheries between Western Australia and NSW.
are UNLIKELY............18,000tonnes in small pelagic fisheries
I'm not sure how they are bringing the sardine industry into the equation when this industry is regulated by proven percentage rates of spawning juveniles, their quota is adapted by research into how the juvenile fish stock are handling the previous year of fishing.
To come in and just smash 18000 tonnes of pelagic fish and not have consequences is not sustainable, have a look at NZ when super trawlers went there, their industry collapsed within several years!!
Greed
The people with there "finger in the pie" will not suffer any ramifications of the effect,
they'll just sail off into the sunset rubbing there hands together.
Sustainability there's only one ocean!!!![]()
but it's science
science has given us global warming beyond doubt
big bang theory and evolution as a given
are we supposed to believe science only when it suits us...?
or can we start to see it as a bought and payed for practice..
besides what kind of scientific conclusion is ''unlikely'' anyway
We had a little discusion about this in the longboard forum a couple of weeks ago.
I 've posted some of it again here for anyone interested.
Looks like it's going to be stopped, all parties in Tassie parliament have come together to vote against it.
www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-22/tas-parliament-opposes-super-trawler/4215594
So the guy bringing the Margiris here was also on the 'independant' committee deciding what the safe quota would be for the fish it's going after. Sound Fishy anyone? (heh)
An initial official green light for a fish quota for the controversial super trawler Margiris came with the active participation of the venture's proponent, a confidential record shows.
Proponent of the Margiris venture, Gerry Geen, was allowed to outline plans to raise a key jack mackerel quota to an advisory committee - then joined most other members of the committee in supporting the proposal, according to minutes obtained by Fairfax.
Recreational fishing and conservation representatives strenuously rejected a doubling of this quota, which they said was based on old and unreliable data.
The decision was a ''perverted process'', the recreational fishing representative, Graham Pike, said yesterday. The Dutch-owned Margiris is due to arrive in Tasmania soon to prepare to fish around south-eastern Australia for a total 18,000 tonne quota of redbait and mackerel awarded by the Australian Fisheries Management Authority to Mr Geen's company, Seafish Tasmania.
Read more: www.canberratimes.com.au/
Had a few beers with a couple of mates who are merchant seamen earlier this evening and I raised the topic of the "Margiris".
They said that wherever these mega trawlers have been, nothing living is left.
Doesn't sound like a sustainable practice to me.
Well if its going to wipe out the oceans they better make sure they get their quota of GW and whales so we rape the oceans fairly.....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the reason they dont fish in their own waters is because there is nothing left to fish cost effectively for these big ships.
Im sure they wouldnt sail some thing that big over here for one catch of 18000 tons going on gwendys numbers 300 tons x 4 smaller boats every 2 days wuold take em only 30 days to fill the quoter, less because its a bigger more efficient net etc
Its gonna be here for quite a few seasons if we let it stay!
I understand what people would be thinking when they see images and media footage of the "F.V Margiris". Indeed it does look like a behemoth with a giant net capable of consuming every living thing.
The reality is that actual fishing is the secondary role for vessels such as this. Its primary purpose is in processing the catch.
The "Margiris" has a capacity to process 250 tons of small pelagic fish per day. Its not much to catch, it is a hell of a lot to process for human consumption. I have been aboard factory ships like the "margiris" so I have seen the huge array of machinery that is required to make this possible.
Access to this processing capability is the real reason this vessel is here. Every attempt at establishing a decent Mackerel fishery in Australia has failed because it is just too labour intensive without this equipment. Back in the day when we purse seined Mackerel and redbait around Tassie the fish meal plant we unloaded to had a similar daily capacity to the "Margiris". Big difference is that in those days it was converted into fish meal and fish oil. The meal was used for chook pellets and garden fertiliser, and the oil, probably the most putrid liquid I have ever seen, or smelt, was used to make womans cosmetics. If only they knew what is in the goop they spread on there face. At any rate, it was a low value end product.
It has been claimed in the media that the "Margiris" is twice as big as any other vessel to fish in Australian waters. I would question this. For decades now European factory ships, in particular the Norwegians, have been catching and processing Blue Whiting in the Antarctic. The product is known as "Sarumi". People would recognise it as "Crab sticks" or the fish cocktail meat they see in supermarkets. It might be claimed that these are not considered Australian waters for the sake of the argument but they sure as hell were when the Navy spent months chasing South American Patagonian Toothfish vessels all around the Southern hemisphere.
It is worth noting that after years of sustainable fishing and "Cod Wars" as Iceland tried to protect its industry from super trawlers, they all returned for another season of exploitation and caught no fish at all.Not Half or a Quarter of past averages virtually overnight the fishery had collapsed.
...
The fact that European super trawlers have so reduced fish stocks of their more benevolent oceanic environment that they are prepared to sail halfway around the world for a minuscule quota of low-value fish should raise alarm bells here.
Their political power in the European Union is to be feared.
When they are told to go home or prevented from completing their catch quota, don't be surprised if Australian authorities are challenged in international courts.
And don't be surprised if the industry's more traditional practice in Europe is applied and this huge vessel is anchored in the approach channel to Port Phillip Bay, blocking traffic into the Port of Melbourne.http://afr.com/p/opinion/super_trawler_is_blight_on_the_seas_fPC03LwgMP7wIQRBZQv1bL
As reported in the PORT LINCOLN times.
By Kimberlee Meier
Sept. 4, 2012, midnight
.
PORT Lincoln is unlikely to become the base for the FV Margiris after becoming the first port in Australia to allow the super trawler to dock at its wharf.
The commercial fishing trawler has met all requirements to become an Australian flagged vessel, subject to commonwealth government approval, and was yesterday renamed the Abel Tasman.
Seafish Tasmania director Gerry Geen said yesterday the company had lodged an application for Brisbane to become the super trawler's home port.
“We have lodged the application for Brisbane to be its home port, however that does not mean it will be based in Brisbane ... it may not even visit Brisbane,” he said.
“The fact is that we intend to operate the vessel in the fishery stretching from the NSW to Queensland border to Western Australia and, of course, that includes Tasmania.
“During operation the Abel Tasman may visit a number of ports, including Devonport, as was our original plan, to offload our catch, resupply the ship and change work crews.”
Twenty of the vessel's employees flew to Port Lincoln from Devonport yesterday to board the vessel.
Mr Geen said once the trawler had been reflagged, Seafish would apply to have its quota transferred to the fishing vessel before it left Port Lincoln to fish in the Great Australian Bight.
He said a European net and excluder design expert would be on board the trawler for its first fishing trip, as well as an Australian Fisheries Management Authority by-catch mitigation expert.
“The design of the excluder follows more than 12 months' research including a video camera inside the nets during the operation of another of our vessels to study the behaviour of animals like dolphins and seals,” he said.
“It is designed to guide them to an exit from the net.”
The 142-metre vessel is scheduled to leave Port Lincoln at 6pm tonight.
Wildcatch Fisheries SA chairman Jonas Woolford said people should not let “ill informed emotion” cloud the issue of the science behind the FV Margiris fishing in Australian waters.
“I believe people are jumping to conclusions based on misinformation being thrown out there by desperate alarmist extremist groups that are intent on stopping fishing all together,” he said.
“Why anyone would want to shut down the harvesting of an under-utilised, totally sustainable, free range, organic, protein source with one of the lowest carbon and water footprints possible is just beyond me.”
Sardines have been highlighted as one of the fisheries potentially at risk from the trawler as it is a pelagic fishery, meaning the fish cannot be targeted in one specific spot and they are also a mid-water species - the same water depth the trawler aims for.
Mr Woolford said he did not believe the trawler posed a threat to South Australian fish resources.
However, he said if the vessel did not hold sardine quota to enable it to keep and process any it may catch then that could pose a risk to the local industry.
Mr Woolford said as mid-water trawling was targeted fishing, the only issue the FV Margiris should encounter was if it did not have a quota allocation for a species that may be schooling with or near its targeted species.
“There is always the risk that there may be an interaction with a threatened, endangered or protected species.
“While I am confident every effort will be made to avoid these there may be an entanglement and an unintended death,” he said.
“This will be thoroughly investigated and reported by the Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) observers on board and if determined appropriate action taken, including being ordered back to port and tied up.
“Many local fishermen will attest to the extremely cautionary approach taken by AFMA and this situation will not be any different
They are allowed to kill 10 seals a day
if they get to the quota they have to move 50 miles out of the killing zone WTF keep it outa OZ waters....![]()
Now turns out that the government is subsidizing the export fees for the company. So we're paying them to rape our seas[}:)]
Ocean trash [plastic] like on quantum last night, What a great job this ship could
do for the world if used for that. We could possibly employ a fleet of them and do
the world a lot of good ![]()
![]()
[}:)]
www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/super-trawler-banned-from-fishing-in-australian-waters-20120911-25po8.html ![]()
ps. they renamed it the "Abel Tasman"