That thing looks wrong from every single angle, which takes a particularly skilled designer. 
yes i agree looks wrong on so many levels.
you have either a bike or a sportscar not a ugly hybrid of both.
It's a conjoined twin.
You should never make motorbikes and cars in the same factory.
The dangers are obvious.
There seems to be a basic design flaw...
....where do you put your Sup, Windsurfers, sails, masts, booms and stuff?
-sticking to the van!
Just a few hours with an angle grinder and cut-off disc and you could have yourself a bright shiny red motorbike....
Skid is on the money - Before cars Used to have Horse & Carriage and the driver was up front on the bench in the elements,, and the passengers were in the box bit.
The equality factor with a normal sidecar is U both wear the weather.
Doesn't matter how much U gloss it up - 1 stuffed motor bike with a chauffer - even the dog would be in comfort when it is pouring.
So (assuming it is 4 real
)
1. Exploring the brief: 10/10
2. Wasting a good MBike 10/10
3. Build quality: 5/10 looks NAF on the handling front, but 1 more point for A/C in the side cabin + 1 more point for rapid detach frame lugs & 1 more point for being able to ride detached bike around town for 20 minutes[}:)]
4. Is it real: 12/10 if photo chop -- Adobe angle grinders can work wonders
or if real..
10/10 if it was entered in a competition with a prize pool of $100 K and at least came 3rd
5. Ride-ability .. Can it easily go up to and beyond 120 Km/h in comfort for 2+ hours: Yes 4/10 - still a lost cause... No 0/10 a slower lost cause..
Enough lunch break is being wasted
Like my down winder in sub 10 knots Y'day - better then mowing the lawn
AP
