Woo! New site is online - select here to use it!


Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

solar power bill

Reply
Created by landyacht > 9 months ago, 14 Jan 2010
landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
14 Jan 2010 8:39PM
Thumbs Up

last june we had a 3kw system installed on the roof in kalgoorlie, and weve just got our first bill
29/7/09-20/11/09 $63.80 CR.
the system is angled 35degrees to the west of north , so get best performance in the afternoon,. winter seems to get 8-10 kwh per day and summer gives 18-19kwh per day.
it get dusty here so a fortnightly wash is required.
our nxt bill should have the months when the evaporative Aircon gets used so it will be interesting to compare

latedropeddy
VIC, 417 posts
14 Jan 2010 11:59PM
Thumbs Up

awesome!

decrepit
WA, 12889 posts
14 Jan 2010 9:05PM
Thumbs Up

Well you're ahead of us, our bill a few days ago was $30 credit, but ours is only a 1kw version, angled exactly North but only at 8 degrees, so we don't quite make optimum on the longest day.
At the moment it looks like on a yearly basis we'll end up very close to even. Won't know till June, (when ours was installed.)

Interestingly I hosed ours down after a few months, (get a lot of salt and dust here), but for some reason that seemed to make it worse?????

landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
14 Jan 2010 9:26PM
Thumbs Up

i get up with window cleaning gear, it makes a difference of 200w? when they are squeeky clean. did you manage to get onto the ' Household Renewable Energy Scheme" that the WA govt has going?

decrepit
WA, 12889 posts
14 Jan 2010 9:33PM
Thumbs Up

We got the fed's $8,000 rebate, didn't know the WA govt was doing anything.
I'll have to check, thanks for the tip.

landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
14 Jan 2010 9:45PM
Thumbs Up

your too late it was (will be ) a nice tidy sum.
have a look at www.energy.wa.gov.au as there may be future rebates

Sailhack
VIC, 5000 posts
15 Jan 2010 9:52AM
Thumbs Up

decrepit said...

Well you're ahead of us, our bill a few days ago was $30 credit, but ours is only a 1kw version, angled exactly North but only at 8 degrees, so we don't quite make optimum on the longest day.
At the moment it looks like on a yearly basis we'll end up very close to even. Won't know till June, (when ours was installed.)

Interestingly I hosed ours down after a few months, (get a lot of salt and dust here), but for some reason that seemed to make it worse?????


Same...$30 credit, but from Aug to Oct (still heating house over that period), I'm hoping for a better outcome over summer as we generally don't need AC, use cross-ventilation & seabreeze instead. Missus not overly-impressed, after forking out for them, but I told her they weren't there to 'make money', but as a long-term method of 'saving-money' and to make us feel good about doing something for the environment.

1.4kw system directly north - 21deg elevation. Oh, and bird sh!t is our main issue!

Grasshopper
NSW, 58 posts
15 Jan 2010 10:45AM
Thumbs Up

This is good feed back for me.

I just finished the approval process, to install Solar over here in NSW.



maxm
NSW, 864 posts
15 Jan 2010 11:30AM
Thumbs Up

So what sort of money are we talking to supply and install such a system?

westozwind
WA, 1420 posts
15 Jan 2010 9:04AM
Thumbs Up

Damn! Looks like the gov. is on to you guys
They are planning to introduce a tariff on feeding power to the grid
http://www.clean.energy.wa.gov.au/pages/re_feed-in_tariff.asp

MintoxGT
WA, 975 posts
15 Jan 2010 5:42PM
Thumbs Up

OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

W$%&K%S bloody F%^k*&G WAB&^%

Leave us alonne YOU GOVY AR5HOLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AAAAAARRRRGGGHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Christ almighty we take charge of a situation and get re reemed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I AM SO FREAKING ANGRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MintoxGT
WA, 975 posts
15 Jan 2010 5:43PM
Thumbs Up

No wonder people go postal!

doggie
WA, 15849 posts
15 Jan 2010 5:46PM
Thumbs Up

westozwind said...

Damn! Looks like the gov. is on to you guys
They are planning to introduce a tariff on feeding power to the grid
http://www.clean.energy.wa.gov.au/pages/re_feed-in_tariff.asp


Thats easy, dont feed it back to the grid and store excess.

SMG
QLD, 208 posts
15 Jan 2010 7:57PM
Thumbs Up

Or buy more Air-cons/Fridges/Toasters/Things that go bing.....or anything else that'll soak up that excess!

landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
15 Jan 2010 7:49PM
Thumbs Up

westozwind said...

Damn! Looks like the gov. is on to you guys
They are planning to introduce a tariff on feeding power to the grid
http://www.clean.energy.wa.gov.au/pages/re_feed-in_tariff.asp



"A net feed-in tariff scheme will be introduced in Western Australia from 1 July 2010. The new tariff will be PAID on all excess electricity exported to the grid from small-scale household renewable energy systems".
PAID!!!! they are already paying us , hence the credit on the bill.
Its presently on a sliding scale depending on the time of year , time of day and day of the week. our max output to the grid works well on this scaled system , the new feed in tariff is Supposedly going to make the effort even more worthwhile

Smedg
NSW, 836 posts
15 Jan 2010 11:06PM
Thumbs Up

latedropeddy said...

awesome!


awesome. nice work guys. wish i could own a house and put solar panels on it and mow the lawn when i feel like it not just to keep the real estate happy good to read such positive comments (mostly haha mintoxGT..)

MintoxGT
WA, 975 posts
16 Jan 2010 12:09AM
Thumbs Up

Smedg said...

latedropeddy said...

awesome!


awesome. nice work guys. wish i could own a house and put solar panels on it and mow the lawn when i feel like it not just to keep the real estate happy good to read such positive comments (mostly haha mintoxGT..)


Ooops

I was very impressed with the boys effort as we have been considering doing the same, well done indeed

Cheers Smedg

landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
16 Jan 2010 7:44PM
Thumbs Up

Its OK , i had to read it twice

MintoxGT
WA, 975 posts
16 Jan 2010 11:16PM
Thumbs Up

landyacht said...

Its OK , i had to read it twice


getfunky
WA, 4485 posts
18 Jan 2010 5:13PM
Thumbs Up

Kn tops work LY!

I'm with Mr Cruise. Wassa startup costs like?

Would love to do this but the smallest area of our roof is that which faces Nth. Solahart has pride of place there too.

Sailhack
VIC, 5000 posts
18 Jan 2010 9:25PM
Thumbs Up

The whole setup (1.4kw system) cost us $7.5k...this was after the Vic gov 'chipped-in' $8k, and we bought in bulk with about 30 other locals, saving about $3k...so (maths) full price would be $18.5k. Not feasible in Vic, but makes me feel good that by spending some coin we basically won't get power bills, and I'm doing a (small) part for the environment.

There are cheaper systems about, but we went with the 'coastal' frames & inverter, living about 150m from sea. The inverter is also larger than needed to allow for expanding the system down the track. I also chose 'mono-crystalline' panels as opposed to 'Amorphous' (spelling?), that were being pushed at us. The latter are apparently more efficient, and cheaper, but take about 3 times the area that the mc panels take up...and I just can't see that as efficient. It would've also made it impossible to add to the system at a later date due to size of roof.

decrepit
WA, 12889 posts
18 Jan 2010 8:53PM
Thumbs Up

We paid about $2,700 for our 1kw system, plus $300 or something for a new power metre.
Signed the govt $8,000 rebate and the carbon credit sale rights over to the supply company.

But I heard that the price has dropped a bit since, one company was offering a $0 cost to the customer, as long as they had their govt aproval of course.

japie
NSW, 7146 posts
19 Jan 2010 2:10AM
Thumbs Up

I owned a house in Bathurst with three kids in the family. It gets bloody cold there in winter but the solahart water heater the previous owner installed never failed. It always gave me a warm feeling that there was no middleman between the panels and the sun.

What a lot of people do not take into account as far as electricity is concerned is that what we use as individuals is microscopic in comparison to what is used by industry.

I worked in an aluminium plant that was drawing so much current that downtime caused so much inconvenience at the power plant that it attracted a $250k penalty. Likewise with water. I worked in a chicken abattoir in the Hunter that was slaughtering 130k birds a day. You could canoe down the sluice to the effluent plant.

You guys who have broached the wall may not recoup your investments but you are beating a path toward sustainability.

getfunky
WA, 4485 posts
19 Jan 2010 10:56AM
Thumbs Up

Noice work. Ta for the info.. would like to go down this road in the future too.

Mobydisc
NSW, 9029 posts
19 Jan 2010 2:39PM
Thumbs Up

Anyone know any decent solar power installers in the Sydney area?

pweedas
WA, 4642 posts
19 Jan 2010 12:13PM
Thumbs Up

japie said...

You guys who have broached the wall may not recoup your investments but you are beating a path toward sustainability.




I hate to burst your bubble but,..
Solar power on the roof with the current technology does nothing more than make the householder feel good. "We're saving the planet!"
It's a bit like washing out the cat food tins for recycling. A total waste of time, effort and water but hey, what the heck! "In this house, We RECYCLE!".
Recycling is good, right?

The only thing that makes solar power viable today is that a huge proportion of the cost is covered by someone else. i.e anyone who doesn't have it, via the government subsidies.
This does NOT make it an efficient solution to the environmental problem.
It is more like a pyramid selling scheme. They are intrinsically unsound and eventually collapse under their own weight.

Let's look at solar power.
The real cost of even a small 1kw system is around $10,000 to $12,000, maybe more, although they are coming down.

Under ideal conditions a 1kw system will generate about 4 kilowatt hours of electricity per day, iff you are lucky. That's when it is new and the panels are clean and in good condition.

4 Kwhrs can be generated at a conventional power station for about 2 cents per unit.
Nuclear power comes in slightly higher. Let's be pessimistic and say 4 cents per Kwhr.
They can generate it and sell it to you via the grid for about 15 cents per kwhr.

AT 15 cents per kwhr you will need to generate 10,000 / .15 =66,666 kwhrs of power before the system breaks even.
At 4 kwhrs per day this will take 66,666 / 4 =16,666 days = 45 years! just to break even.
The panels don't last that long.
The electronics will not last that long.

The whole thing is a "feel good" exercise conducted by the government to make people believe that they have everything under control.
It is no more than standing on the roof and pithing on you and telling you that it's raining.
Why?
Because in the final wash, it is YOU who pay for it.

The government might give it to you for free but while they give it to you with one hand they will take it from you with the other.
They have to.
They don't produce anything to sell themselves. They just take the money they need off you.

The only viable near and long term solution is nuclear power.
Unfortunately, in the near term this will have to be from nuclear fission,
but in the long term it will be from nuclear fusion, a very clean and hugely abundant and efficient form of power.

Every day, month and year that we fart around with wind power, (pun intended)
burn a hole in our pockets with solar power,
or wash ourselves down the drain with wave power,
it is another day and dollar wasted that could have been spent on taking us down the right path.
Solar power is NOT the right path.

Sailing ships and windmills were not abandoned because the wind stopped blowing.
It just became obvious that it was hugely unreliable.
Same with solar power.
Same with wave power.

Gestalt
QLD, 14986 posts
19 Jan 2010 2:33PM
Thumbs Up

looking at your figures i beleive there are some flaws.

you haven't quoted the cost of electricity that we pay at the wall, there is no allowance for tarrifs etc.

i also don't think you have taken into account selling the power back to the grid.

also, 1kw system is not really recommended. it used to be 1.5-2kw and now houses are starting to use 4kw and some 8kw.

you also haven't taken into account the increase in cost of power over the time that the solar array is functioning.

it's a complex issue

then when that is all done,

take the cost of the array and stick it in the bank and see how much interest you get over the period.

pweedas
WA, 4642 posts
19 Jan 2010 1:21PM
Thumbs Up

Gestalt said...
looking at your figures i beleive there are some flaws.


Yes I know. These are ball park facts and figures to illustrate the point.
I have previously done more accurate analysis and it comes up the same.


you haven't quoted the cost of electricity that we pay at the wall, there is no allowance for tarrifs etc.

That's right. Because these tarrifs might make it a better deal for YOU, but they don't make the overall system financially viable for everyone.
It just means you are taking the money off someone else to make YOUR system pay.


i also don't think you have taken into account selling the power back to the grid.


Yes I did. That's one of the points I was trying to make.
YOUR system is only viable IFF you can sell it back to the grid at a price very much higher than the electicity companies can produce the power themselves.
They will only do this while being forced to by the government.
The government recognises this and they realise it can very quickly become top heavy and run them broke.
That is why they have 'grandfather clauses' on the return to grid deals. They automatically expire in a few years.
That's not really suitable when it is clear that it will take 20 to 40 years for you to break even.


also, 1kw system is not really recommended. it used to be 1.5-2kw and now houses are starting to use 4kw and some 8kw.


That's true. The bigger systems do become slightly more cost efficient, but only slightly.
The reason is that a bigger system costs a lot more. They can run up to $30,000 total cost for a large system.
The government will subsides you more for this but the point I am making is that basing your assessment on a post subsidy price is false logic.
It's a pretend result overall. SOmebody will have to pay for it in the end.
There is "NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH".


you also haven't taken into account the increase in cost of power over the time that the solar array is functioning.

it's a complex issue

It is. That's why it is so easy for the real situation to be made obscur. And that's what is happening


then when that is all done,

take the cost of the array and stick it in the bank and see how much interest you get over the period.


Yes. But take the REAL cost of the system and put that in the bank and see how much you have in 30 years.
OR
Better still, take the REAL cost of the system and invest it either nuclear power or at least in research in nuclear power and see how much it is worth in 30 years.

The sad reality is that since all the negative pulicity around nuclear power over the last 30 years, research into cleaner and safer nuclear power has all but ceased.
This has put us 30 years behind where we should be today.

Even with the small amount spent on it, we now have reliable technology for 4th generation nuclear reactors which are 10 times more efficient and cleaner and intrinsically safer than the 2nd and 3rd gen nuclear reactors.

The whole point is,.. we need a reliable and guarranteed continuous supply of energy to remain a first world country.
Solar, wind and wave power does NOT give us this.
Today is 37 degrees, overcast and no wind.
Everyone has their air cons on, their computers running. etc etc.
What are you going to do?
Tell them that due to prevailing conditions you will have to turn everything off until conditions improve?
I don't think so.

To cater for this situation, the power companies still have to build their generators EXACTLY the same size and capacity that they would if there was NO solar, NO wind and NO wave power.
It saves them NOTHING.



FlySurfer
NSW, 4460 posts
19 Jan 2010 4:34PM
Thumbs Up

doggie: what kind of capacitor do you propose he use?

pweedas
WA, 4642 posts
19 Jan 2010 1:59PM
Thumbs Up

Back to the Future.
A "flux Capacitor" maybe?
I will just look up my catalogue and see what they cost today.
Hmmm,,, strange. Thery don't seem to be listed.
Maybe they just sold out.

Trant
NSW, 601 posts
19 Jan 2010 5:38PM
Thumbs Up

Why can't he simply use the excess electricity to fire up a laptop, post a thread like this and then harness the hot air generated during cloudy days/nights?

Fair play to the people having a go, it's not just about money.





Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"solar power bill" started by landyacht