KBM is now out in the shops and it has had an overhaul with a new layout and a new designer.
Thanks to all the crew who submitted articles and travel stories.
If you have an article or photos that you want to submit for our December edition now is the time to get it to us
Simply email us at [email protected]
Check it out now plus OZONE has donated a $400 prize pack to the reader who supplies the best photo. All details are on page 38.
that photo on the cover of Keahi is sick! got a copy on friday- really good quality issue! love the new layout/style!
Just got the Kiteboarder Magazine. Awesome edition, sickest front covershot and story of Keahi de Aboitiz. Good content and a very nice design. Keep it up Beaver and the whole KBM crew.
Now go and grab a copy at your local newsagent!!
Who buys a kite mag to look at chicks? I mean you're all reading this sitting at your computers, hooked up to the internet. To the red thumb KBM fanboys can't you find better than that bulgarian bulger for free?
The order of value contained within a kite mag from best to worst goes like this:
Awesome kite/wave pics (equal first with)
Genuine kite gear news/new product announcements, unbiased reviews, etc
Trip & spot reports, other
page filler 'interviews'
ads
biased reviews/advertorials
'brown wings/bloody ****s' jokes pages
the index page
any other page
sunny coast skanks in bikinis
Lets face it, kite reviews in any magazine are a big f#*king waste of space... Obviously the mag isn't going to tell you the kite is a POS are they... so what is the point???
More magazines full of sick pictures is what I want to see, similar to what Core was or like the aussie "skate journal" just full of amazing shots.
All this being said I don't think you can really blame KBM for any of this, these guys put in a solid effort and to be honest with what they have to work with I think they do a pretty good job.
After all you have to remember in the end a magazine is a business and you have to cater to those that support and fund it by printing their lame ass cr@p... and that's half the reason anything good like Core disappears.
Hey Guys just a quick bit of background on the topic of reviews.
We choose to do a BUYERS guide NOT a review with the idea that the reader can compare the different kites according to a set of criteria. The aim of this is so that people can get an overview of what they might be interested in looking into further.
We have done kite reviews in the past BUT what we found was that the riders only gave good reviews to the kites they were used to and anything else got low ratings.
Plus riding 20 plus kites in one session is hard as they all start to feel the same.
Its a bit of a NO WIN situation as it is not easy to keep your advertisers happy when they get a bad review.
I just wanted to point our philosophy was not to do a review but provide information in an easy to understand format.
We are doing a Board Buyers guide this next issue.
We are always keen for more good content so if you have quality pics or articles we would love to publish them. There is a severe lack of good content being provided so let us know if you have stuff.
Thanks
Beav
If you think a paid for magazine is ever going to have a REAL kite review, you are tripping.
The best kite review is the one you do yourself by testing it... Most decent brands you should be able to try out somehow, chances are if you can't your not missing much anyway.
And you think a "kite review" in a magazine that is supported and paid mostly by the brands that are being tested wont just be some "buying guide" in disguise???... It can't be anything but that, or at least some sort of biased review... if it wasn't the brands wouldn't want to advertise in the mag... think about it.
What are you talking about?... How can I give you an "example", it's called simple logic, use your brain.
Do I have to spell it out for you? (ok rhetorical question).
1. Kite mags are funded from advertising they sell in the magazine.
2. Majority of advertising comes from industry sponsors (people who make kites).
3. Kite mags usually do a review of kites that the mag is funded by (rarely do they include other brands that don't support the mag in some way).
4. Kite mag now has a conflict of interest as they don't want to annoy or anger the people that fund their publication, thus;
5. A useless biased "kite review" is born.
Perhaps some mags are better than others at pointing out obvious positive attributes in kite design, but I doubt they would be any more beneficial to you than some words from a mate at the beach.
To think that kitesurf-magazine or any other industry funded publication is somehow different to KBM in this regard is sheer ignorance.
Sir Rowdy is right.
Even the Link got favorable reviews in the mags.
No editor is going to print negative stuff about a kite.
Have you noticed that there are no kites tested that don't advertise in the mag?
Work it out for yourself. If that's how you feel good on you, stick to what you feel don't worry about the clowns on here.
I'm not going out to go buy kitemags and read stupid reviews in order to give you some sort of further in-depth education.