Whenever something becomes posible to do people will always question wether it should be done .Katie could raise a future noble prize winner or another milat who knows but lets say just another average person thats cool .Average people can have furfilling lives also.
But i dont find this average i personally know of two lesbians one who already had two children but they wanted to have a baby together so they got artfically inseminated the sperm donated buy a gay male friend in exchange for mother surragating for the gay male couple.
They split up
So at the end of they day we have i might add black male child being raised by divorced white lesbians who would have to be some of the most disfunctional people i have ever meet.
That said he seems like a really good kid & i hope he stays that way he still gets love & affection & all the material things & education etc so its not wrong either but i think they have throw up a couple of extra hurdles for him to get over & i get annoyed at the parents selfishness for that & I accept I could be being biggoted .
That said if they can do it anybody can.
Nothings right or wrong in the expanding of the gene pool .
What wrong or write is the nuturing of a child through till they are adults & can except there own responsibiltys if katies got that sorted shouldnt be a problem
As bjw said...and no, not the 'whitney' post
.
"do you trust us for credible advice?"
I'm not sure what's more disturbing simondo, the fact you're pimping your friend, or your asking for serious advice here amongst the breezers...which for most of us have spent far too much time in the water & (speaking for myself) still struggle with basic decisions like - 'do I pack my 6.5, or will the wind hold so I can just take my 4.7 & 5.5...or should I load up my big board as well incase it drops sooner than later, or the sup incase it drops completely...aaaarrgghhh!'![]()