Woo! New site is online - select here to use it!


Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

Fuel prices Again!!!

Reply
Created by Gunna1 > 9 months ago, 15 Mar 2012
Gunna1
154 posts
15 Mar 2012 8:56AM
Thumbs Up

What hope have we got of lowering fuel prices? filled up this morning at $1.41, used a 4c voucher so paid $1.37, still a blatant ripoff. Drove away from servo past the servo 100 metres down the road where fuel is $1.54 and no voucher discount and there was 5 cars there filling up. The $1.41 sign is plain to see form this servo, I just don't get it. I am not saying the fuel companies are going to change their ways through our little protests, but why would you pay an extra 13c a litre if you don't need to!!!!

Mobydisc
NSW, 9029 posts
15 Mar 2012 12:09PM
Thumbs Up

Maybe they use a fuel card provided to them and they don't pay for the fuel themselves?

Fuel companies are making tons of money and everyone is wondering why fuel is so expensive. Its something the ACCC and the powers that be just can't work out. They probably don't want to work it out coz they are making billions out of it themselves. Even LPG is expensive which is strange as its flogged off for next to nothing to the Chinese, Koreans and whoever else wants it.




Mark _australia
WA, 23715 posts
15 Mar 2012 9:22AM
Thumbs Up

Well the last big fuel rises a few years back were caused by the Aussie dollar being weak.
Now it is caused by the Aussie dollar being strong.

That's what the fuel companies have said anyway

jimbo76
WA, 46 posts
15 Mar 2012 10:07AM
Thumbs Up

I can't understand why LPG has become so expensive all of a sudden - the wife was telling me it jumped by 20 cents or so from when I was last home (only ben away 13 days). It is now more economical for us to run her car on petrol instead of gas, park the ute up as its dedicated gas and use the 4b instead as its diesel. What a scam, I won't go in to all the details but export pays less than a few cents a litre - the companies I've worked for that run their mines on gas turbines pay about the same or a little less. As usual the consumer has to pay for the price gouging through the fuel stations. BP is always more expensive than elsewhere but we always get issued BP fuel cards.

mattyjee
WA, 575 posts
15 Mar 2012 10:40AM
Thumbs Up

LNG and domestic gas is not the same as LPG.

LNG and domestic gas is methane. Cheap and abundant. Difficult to store and transport and that's why it is sold cheaply.

LPG is propane/butane. Higher energy density, easy to store and transport and therefore has a higher demand and lower availability hence why it costs more.

Fuel will always be expensive because people want it so much. We really take it for granted, that one little litre of this magic liquid can transport us and our 2 tonnes of steel for over 10km. Try pushing your car that far (and at 100kph) and you might start to appreciate how much energy each human being uses in a typical day on this planet without any thought to how lucky we are to have it.

mineral1
WA, 4564 posts
15 Mar 2012 11:36AM
Thumbs Up

Why would our present day Government of either side of the house want the price to come down to a realistic level. The Government is addicted to the tax it drags from this commodity, more we pay, the more the Government rips out of our pocket.

doggie
WA, 15849 posts
15 Mar 2012 11:56AM
Thumbs Up

Wot me worry? Fuel cards rule

choco
SA, 4187 posts
15 Mar 2012 2:52PM
Thumbs Up

mineral1 said...

Why would our present day Government of either side of the house want the price to come down to a realistic level. The Government is addicted to the tax it drags from this commodity, more we pay, the more the Government rips out of our pocket.


+1......we are simply being milked for every cent we earn on everything nowdays and until the day when everyone refuses to buy fuel then the price will drop.

youngbull
QLD, 826 posts
15 Mar 2012 2:46PM
Thumbs Up

I don't get how

1lt Diesel = $1.50
1lt Water = $3.20 - the cheaper brand
0.6lt Coke = $3.80
0.7lt JD = $42.00


Work that one out.

doggie
WA, 15849 posts
15 Mar 2012 1:16PM
Thumbs Up

youngbull said...

I don't get how

1lt Diesel = $1.50
1lt Water = $3.20 - the cheaper brand
0.6lt Coke = $3.80
0.7lt JD = $42.00


Work that one out.




Tax

Ian K
WA, 4170 posts
15 Mar 2012 1:18PM
Thumbs Up

youngbull said...

I don't get how

1lt Diesel = $1.50
1lt Water = $3.20 - the cheaper brand
0.6lt Coke = $3.80
0.7lt JD = $42.00


Work that one out.




I've worked it out. Petrol is way too cheap. It's a remarkable fluid, has an energy content of 34 MJ/litre. Coke is 1.87MJ/litre.

And petrol is so cheap folks burn it on a whim. Out of every 100 litres burnt I wonder how many are because we're getting about in a vehicle way larger than needed for the job? And just for status, or a fashion statement. Mobile metallic sculptures. When it's all gone in 50 years we'll look back at the cars that burnt it and be horrified.

Raise the price to $5.00 immediately. We'd get by on half of it quite easily. 1/4 with a bit of effort. Then it will last 200 yrs.

evlPanda
NSW, 9207 posts
15 Mar 2012 4:28PM
Thumbs Up

mineral1 said...

Why would our present day Government of either side of the house want the price to come down to a realistic level. The Government is addicted to the tax it drags from this commodity, more we pay, the more the Government rips out of our pocket.


Too right!! And where does the money all go then? It probably all goes overseas, or they just put it in a big pile and burn it.

I really think the Government should be acting more like a for profit business, rather than spending all that money on its citizens all the time.

By the way we need better school, hospitals and roads.

Mark _australia
WA, 23715 posts
15 Mar 2012 1:32PM
Thumbs Up

Ian K said...

youngbull said...

I don't get how

1lt Diesel = $1.50
1lt Water = $3.20 - the cheaper brand
0.6lt Coke = $3.80
0.7lt JD = $42.00


Work that one out.




I've worked it out. Petrol is way too cheap. It's a remarkable fluid, has an energy content of 34 MJ/litre. Coke is 1.87MJ/litre.

And petrol is so cheap folks burn it on a whim. Out of every 100 litres burnt I wonder how many are because we're getting about in a vehicle way larger than needed for the job? And just for status, or a fashion statement. Mobile metallic sculptures. When it's all gone in 50 years we'll look back at the cars that burnt it and be horrified.

Raise the price to $5.00 immediately. We'd get by on half of it quite easily. 1/4 with a bit of effort. Then it will last 200 yrs.




Can tell you don't live in the bush

How do I halve my fuel useage - walk 100km to get groceries I guess.

I think as the most natural resourse rich country in the world be should all be driving $10K new cars, paying 20c/L for petrol and have the strongest economy in the world. Imagine our production capability if energy costs were stuff all!

Ian K
WA, 4170 posts
15 Mar 2012 1:51PM
Thumbs Up

Mark _australia said...


Can tell you don't live in the bush

How do I have my fuel useage - walk 100km to get groceries I guess.

I think as the most natural resourse rich country in the world be should all be driving $10K new cars, paying 20c/L for petrol and have the strongest economy in the world. Imagine our production capability if energy costs were stuff all!


A fuel subsidy for farmers and their service providers is a well established way of getting around that. If you're not a farmer or a prospector can you justify a petrol-dependant lifestyle in the bush?

It would have to be a global measure if countries with energy-hungry economies weren't to be disadvantaged. Isn't that what a global carbon tax is optimistically heading towards?

We'll have to make the swing to energy-frugal economies one day. Would you rather the easy way or the hard way? I'll guess that people being people we'll do it the hard way.

Radmac
WA, 201 posts
15 Mar 2012 1:55PM
Thumbs Up

We are addicted to oil - it has a relatively inelastic demand.

Current fuel price increases are being driven by increased prices being paid to build up storage due to concerns over Israel/Iran. Classic supply and demand in a free market world.

Supply however is presently regulated by large oil producing countries in the gulf. Supply costs there are cheap, but it is a finite resource, so that are making the money while they can (perhaps there is a lesson there for Australia) - not fair, but that is the way it is.

In other countries, supply costs are much more expensive, and risk is high. Margins are tighter.

So the story is get used to increasing fuel prices - it will get worse. You can argue on the government card, but this does not cut - goverment taxes, that is the way it is.

Oil in it forms (diesel, petrol,LPG) is getting harder to get (peak oil?), demand is going up, the crunch is coming. This resource will run out, and there will be interesting times

The problem for all developed counties is that pretty much all of our production (food, minerals, water) is tied to this cheap fuel - if it goes up then all costs go up.

Green Cherub
WA, 296 posts
15 Mar 2012 2:20PM
Thumbs Up

evlPanda said...

I really think the Government should be acting more like a for profit business, rather than spending all that money on its citizens all the time.

By the way we need better school, hospitals and roads.


*facepalm*

Mobydisc
NSW, 9029 posts
15 Mar 2012 5:53PM
Thumbs Up

According to some geologists crude oil is the the result of underground bacterial activity and its being created all the time in huge quantities. I think primarily some Russian geologists follow this theory. A lot of new oil deposits are being found in Russia.

From what I've read the whole oil prospecting industry is so secretive that very few people have any idea of how much crude oil is around. Those in the know laugh when oil prices go up.


Existing technology is out there to greatly improve fuel economy at little cost. Low powered diesel engines use little fuel. Some of the most economical cars were made in the 1970s like the Mk1 diesel VW Golf from that decade. These sorts of cars without all the mod cons would be cheap to make and cheap to run.

jusavina
QLD, 1506 posts
15 Mar 2012 4:53PM
Thumbs Up

youngbull said...

I don't get how

1lt Diesel = $1.50
1lt Water = $3.20 - the cheaper brand
0.6lt Coke = $3.80
0.7lt JD = $42.00


Work that one out.




And the problem is that I use more water than my car use petrol...

Mark _australia
WA, 23715 posts
15 Mar 2012 3:32PM
Thumbs Up

Ian K said...

Mark _australia said...


Can tell you don't live in the bush

How do I have my fuel useage - walk 100km to get groceries I guess.

I think as the most natural resourse rich country in the world be should all be driving $10K new cars, paying 20c/L for petrol and have the strongest economy in the world. Imagine our production capability if energy costs were stuff all!


A fuel subsidy for farmers and their service providers is a well established way of getting around that. If you're not a farmer or a prospector can you justify a petrol-dependant lifestyle in the bush?




You're joking aren't you? So in the bush we can have farmers.... but no education, no cops, no health workers, no shops etc? Policies need to reflect the fact that we are not europe or asia with heaps of population density and thus public transport options - parity pricing was a dumb move for Australia.
Allowing blatant profiteering by the big 3 or 4 petrol companies is even worse, the ACCC is gutless.

Subsidies are useless when the price of diesel has doubled in 10yrs and petrol companies are free to keep jacking it up for no reason with no scrutiny from the Govt or ACCC

mineral1
WA, 4564 posts
15 Mar 2012 4:11PM
Thumbs Up

^^^^^^^^^^ +1 !!!!!

Ian K
WA, 4170 posts
15 Mar 2012 5:30PM
Thumbs Up

Mark _australia said...





You're joking aren't you? So in the bush we can have farmers.... but no education, no cops, no health workers, no shops etc?


Not joking, that's a regional centre with all the services. You can live in a regional centre, supporting the farming community, and not have to drive that far at all. The farmers might have to drive 100km to get supplies, they can be subsidised, as is (could be?) the tradie who goes out to fix the milking machine.

(I lived in the bush capital for 25 yrs, with an energy intensive lifestyle, bush is a loose term)

Mark _australia
WA, 23715 posts
15 Mar 2012 6:16PM
Thumbs Up

^^^ you miss the point Ian. A town of 100 - 500 ppl, about 150km from a capital city has a little deli that you can't do your shopping in so you drive - or pay Woolies online prices - both affected by fuel price. But you say the answer is just "don't live there then" - hardly an option. They are not "regional centres" but still have Govt workers and people living there to provide services.
You made it sound as if only farmers should live there, and as if only regional centres have people who don't farm!

I am in the first town out of Perth, barely past the sight of the CBD, and it costs $50 to drive down and back.

Fuel prices surely must be hurting the econom when the big companies just raise it as they see fit. It is bloody criminal when they claimed hi prices due to Aussie dollar, and when we strengthened from $1.30 to even with the USD the prices didn't drop. Wankers.

Ian K
WA, 4170 posts
15 Mar 2012 6:59PM
Thumbs Up

Mark _australia said...

^^^ you miss the point Ian. A town of 100 - 500 ppl, about 150km from a capital city has a little deli that you can't do your shopping in so you drive - or pay Woolies online prices - both affected by fuel price.


That's true right now, but the little deli is what it is because energy is cheap. Certain low volume lines aren't worth carrying because shoppers drive to the city for a better deal - petrol included. But a change will come, whether we are eased into with a higher fuel tax, redistributed to equalise the rural community, or whether it comes as a crunch is the issue.

You can't blame people for taking advantage of the current cheap fuel, that's the way we are. But those who live in the bush on 4 acres and drive 60 km to work in the city each day are living on borrowed time. There'll be a lot of cheap 4 acre lots available within the next decade or two.

We can easily adapt to burning less petrol, I'm hoping this will be demonstrated fairly soon.

Despite the possibility that 390ppm of Co2 in the atmosphere, and rising, may be a shocker for the climate we still burnt 5.9 % more Carbon in 2011 than 2010.

www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/carbon-emissions-hit-a-new-record-20120313-1uyk8.html

Mobydisc
NSW, 9029 posts
15 Mar 2012 10:43PM
Thumbs Up

If what you say is true its not just people living in the country living on borrowed time. Many Australians need cars to get anywhere as they live in suburbs that have no public transport.

The answer is not to limit people's mobility. People won't accept that. I won't accept that. I live about 300 meters away from a major Sydney suburban train station. My work is a ten minute walk from where I live. So I personally could survive if fuel went up to $5 or $50 a litre. However I enjoy getting out on the weekend to go windsurfing and I have to drive to do so. I like to go for a drive somewhere if I want to. Why shouldn't I? Its still a semi-free country and having a car is a big part of that sense of freedom.

What will happen if fuel continues to up in price is alternatives way of getting around will spring up. Some alternatives seem to be quite expensive and don't really make much sense, like the electric car from GM, the Volt, or hydrogen fueled cars. An alternative which I believe does have legs are cheap low powered diesel vehicles. They could easily get milage of under 4 litres per 100 kms which is better milage than the best hybrid vehicles. Diesel motors can be modified to run on vegetable oil. This is a low tech and cheap way for people to get around even if big oil and big government decides petrol should be $10 or $100 a litre.





CJW
NSW, 1731 posts
15 Mar 2012 10:59PM
Thumbs Up

Payed $1.70 for 98 the other day, and I drive a V8 ^_^ **** happens, it's not going to get radically cheaper in my lifetime, more important things in life to worry about....like why it's not windy more often

Ian K
WA, 4170 posts
15 Mar 2012 9:12PM
Thumbs Up

Mobydisc said...

if fuel went up to $5 or $50 a litre. However I enjoy getting out on the weekend to go windsurfing and I have to drive to do so.



You'd still go windsurfing at $5 a litre. How far do you live from the coast? I used to go most weekends from Canberra, 300 km round trip, $45 worth. Often no wind, turn around go home. Maybe Canberrans have an argument there. Maybe they'd organise a bus, car pool an economical micro car and leave gear down there? maybe lake BG isn't all that bad. Lake George might fill up. There's always a solution.

elmo
WA, 8896 posts
15 Mar 2012 9:28PM
Thumbs Up

We grizzle about $1.50 for a litre of petrol but happily pay +$2 for a bottle of filtered bore water spring water

evlPanda
NSW, 9207 posts
16 Mar 2012 10:49AM
Thumbs Up

Mark _australia said...

^^^ you miss the point Ian. A town of 100 - 500 ppl, about 150km from a capital city has a little deli that you can't do your shopping in so you drive - or pay Woolies online prices - both affected by fuel price. But you say the answer is just "don't live there then" - hardly an option. They are not "regional centres" but still have Govt workers and people living there to provide services.
You made it sound as if only farmers should live there, and as if only regional centres have people who don't farm!

I am in the first town out of Perth, barely past the sight of the CBD, and it costs $50 to drive down and back.

Fuel prices surely must be hurting the econom when the big companies just raise it as they see fit. It is bloody criminal when they claimed hi prices due to Aussie dollar, and when we strengthened from $1.30 to even with the USD the prices didn't drop. Wankers.


I get the feeling you want the government to intervene. I mean you aren't going to get a for profit business to drop prices to make it easier for everyone, and why should they?

evlPanda
NSW, 9207 posts
16 Mar 2012 10:50AM
Thumbs Up

elmo said...

We grizzle about $1.50 for a litre of petrol but happily pay +$2 for a bottle of filtered bore water spring water


It tastes better than the petrol.

elmo
WA, 8896 posts
16 Mar 2012 11:10AM
Thumbs Up

evlPanda said...

elmo said...

We grizzle about $1.50 for a litre of petrol but happily pay +$2 for a bottle of filtered bore water spring water


It tastes better than the petrol.


It should do it costs twice as much.


If you really want proof that the petrol price changes are a farce

Register for fuel watch www.fuelwatch.wa.gov.au/fuelwatch/index.jspx

Then watch the daily price fluctuations in your area between ULP and diesel.

Diesel prices are steady as a rock whilst petrol is all over the place.

How can diesel prices remain steady when it comes from the same crude oil.

doggie
WA, 15849 posts
16 Mar 2012 11:41AM
Thumbs Up

BOOBS (.Y.)



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"Fuel prices Again!!!" started by Gunna1