^^^^
So the message is that if the "blue team" are elected we are going to have an elected PM replaced by someone else when the polls go south.
Isn't that the problem with the current PM?
Talking about lies! Remember what the mad monk said about work choice?
What is he going to call it???? Reborn work choice.... Lazarus w/c, ???? We should run a competition to find a good name for it!![]()
Watch this space!
Mad Monk as PM?
Didn't they all run for cover when Peter Costello's name was mentioned this morning.
Call me cynical, but...
3 things
Blowjob
Bullet
bury
Actually I'd make her dig the hole too.![]()
Her biggest positive is At least she not Revin Krudd, he was just a smug ****er...
Mr Float and Log Man,
To be diplomatic about this, I will state the facts as I see them.
You guys have judged our current government to have governed well and I have judged them to rule poorly and disagree with alot of their economic policies.
The original dispute was over Mr Float believing that I had a go at her because she is a woman which I have stated before that is not the case and am in favour of having women in the PM seat.
I also agree with you that PK was a bit of a let down but I think Bob Hawke did a better job than you give him credit for.
At the end of the day, we either like or dislike the values, policies and decisions of our politicians and are in an environment where being able to debate these differences in opinion are accepted.
I will accept that you have been provided with information that leads you to the conclusion that Julia has governed well, however from my own information that I have been provided, I have judged her to have governed poorly.
Cheers,
[/quote
But mate, where do you get you're facts from. Mine come from Australian bureau of statistics........unemployment DOWN to 4.9 percent. Australian department of Treasury......1B surplus budget. Australian department of defence........troops to be withdrawn from Afghanistan. CSIRO......climate change is happening.
Where do your fact come from?
Logman,
You make some good points and got me interested
..What is the long term unemployment average, excluding seasonal and the unemployable.
does low unemployment have anything to do with a mining boom and skills shortage?
What is the government borrowing associated with this surplus. And our current account deficit?
Is a governments only source of income taxation, does a surplus mean we are being over taxed or our taxes aren't being spent to the full extent.
And the troops, should of been home earlier and it was not Julia's doing, she didn't make that decision...it was a military decision and actually a sign of transferring security back to the afghans, as per the US plan...
No argument on climate change, the economic cost of doing nothing is much larger than the cost of doing something..... but Julia did not have anything to do with it, in fact... no carbon tax was her words... Non core promise? Maybe it is the implementation that has offended people and the fact she was not honest before a very close election.
I have a background in finance and as unemployment goes down, inflation goes up. You can't have one without the other. The 1b surplus budget means that they are not plunging further into the $140b (I have been told) debt that was created and they have raised the self imposed borrowing limit to $350b so that they can spend again come next budget. The surplus just means that we will be able to pay back less than 1% of our current national debt (which did not exist when libs were in). The interest on this debt is $7b per year so you can see that it is more like a fart in the wind.
I agree with them pulling troops from Afghanistan but only if the country is safe for its people and stable to do so. That is why we are still there protecting the democratic process and training their own national guards.
As for climate change, hardly any of the carbon tax is spent on protecting the environment. It goes from in circles from the businesses who pay, who pass it on to the buyers who in turn are given back the money by the government who took it from the businesses in the first place.
That is where I get my opinion from and my information comes from various sources both public and private. I am an engineer who works in the mining industry with a second degree in finance and I have lived overseas for 10 years in Muslim countries and Asian countries.
Believe me when I say that although my opinion is different from yours, it comes from a well educated and experienced level of understanding.
^^^^
I have a background in finance and as unemployment goes down, inflation goes up. You can't have one without the other.
The Phillips Curve arguement has been shown to be false, low unemployment and high inflation (and visa versa) are not in the perfectly predictable relationship that you claim.
You can have one with the other. High Unemployment and high inflation have and will exist concurrently and both will happen despite, not because of, each other. Stagflation (high unemployment and high inflation) was one of the outcomes of the 70's oil price shock.
Also as employment increases you can have low inflation - ie post early 1990's recession.
I stand corrected.
Thanks mate, it has been about 5 years since I did that little piece of study.
Are these one off occurences i.e exemptions to the rule or was this postulation proven to be an incorrect theory on the behaviour of inflation rate and unemployment?
Im sorry for sounding like a douche when saying.. "well I have a background in finance..." I only meant it as Im not pulling this out of my butt.... When I read it again, it sounds kind of laa dee daa....
Are these one off occurences i.e exemptions to the rule or was this postulation proven to be an incorrect theory on the behaviour of inflation rate and unemployment?
Depends which "school of thought" you come from and each side claims that their explanation is better that the others.
The ongoing argument centres on the government versus market solution to economic problems. My view is that it is simpy a set of numbers looking for an explanation.
No offence taken about other comments. ![]()
Keynes baby... New School![]()
![]()
They're all formula of best guess anyway, some points from both are valid and will hold true at different times, neither will hold all the time, it is just impossible to model and have theories that are 100% correct and that's all an economist is doing is trying to model or predict outcomes and if they could do that they wouldn't be economists, they'd be investsors.
As her puppet master I would also be her ventriloquist .
#1
So.. I would allow her to tell more lies , her wooden nose would then grow even longer !
#2
Then lie her down on Craig Thomson's chair , nose up .
#3
Now practice ventriloquism .