There is more graphic stuff out there than that fly. The world is ****ed up mate. This one seems to be no different from an everyday occurrence unfortunately. The thing is its usually hidden from everyday media.
Welcome to the Internets fly its a ****en discrace isnt it !
Welcome to the real world.
W T F! ![]()
My boy is 1 month shy of 2... I can see some nightmares for me tonight ![]()
If you have kids, dont watch it... just stay in the bubble of denial of that sort of ** doesnt actually happen... ![]()
It's the "Peng Yu" effect.http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/661115/Heartless-bystanders-not-solely-Chinese-problem.aspx
www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2011-08/26/content_13199786.htm
There was an incident in the US where somebody got hit crossing the road, someone stopped to help, they got hit too and then somebody stopped to rob them. Something like that anyway. Just last year, can't find source.
I'm with Rod on this one - won't watch it basically on principal. I thought I had lost my toddler a few weeks ago for a few seconds due to a temperature spike ('febrile convulsion' - seizure & collapse, and not breathing), so don't need to watch something that does mentally & physically affect you when you have small kids.
Besides, I see it for real on occasion (SES member) and try to limit the amount of exposure I have to 'real trauma'. Although I acknowledge it happens & can understand the circulation and posting of it on the net, I don't understand why graphic images/videos of trauma, especially involving children, is posted here.
What is the thinking process here?
Search for a graphic, disturbing video.
Find a graphic, disturbing video.
Watch a graphic, disturbing video.
Think: I'll share this graphic, disturbing video with Seabreeze forum members.
Post graphic, disturbing video on Seabreeze!
WTF?
^ It's kinda all over the news. Don't know how you missed it.
news.google.com/?hl=en-AU&gl=AU&ceid=AU:en
Girl died in hospital btw : (
This was everywhere guys anyone who missed it must have been under a rock(blissfully unaware)
I wish i hadnt watched it, probably should have had more sense, i have two small kids
These people will go to jail and some s h i t hole jail in China not the Hilton
For those that did watch it, I thought I heard a response that it was dark, and that they couldn't really see the child. Is that believable?
I don't really want to watch it myself though.
Yes its dark... but you can see how she rag dolls and is moving. Also see a wet patch grow under her. She does move around after each hit and in between.
Very clearly in a bad way. ![]()
Quite possibly one of the most traumatic things I've seen in a very long time of being online... (even back in the early days of rotten.com which were usually still photos)
Possibly BC* it might not have carried the impact it did - its hard not to think of your own kid being in that situation - only just this year (or last year) a kid was backed over by a taxi in Mandurah during a late night pickup.
*BC "Before Children", or more correctly "Before CoitusStoppeth" ![]()
Did you see the one recently posted of a mexican drug cartel member getting his head cut of with a chainsaw?
No... but I was present when a person I worked with took a goats head off with one. ![]()
Weirdly an adult who is involved with illegal stuff, killing another adult involved in illegal stuff doesnt bother me that much. Ditto with war atrocities. (Maybe just been desensitised through movies
)
anyone who ignores people getting hurt or turning a blind eye should be locked up for man slaughter.
There is a difference between news and taking pleasure in watching stuff like this.
Examine your motivation for posting, (seeing as there was no accompanying comment)
Watching this stuff desensitizes you from the next horror you watch. Pretty soon you can end up watching depraved stuff for a kick.
Whatever floats your boat.
I was just questioning your motivation for the post and what your thought processes were.
You never qualified your post with a comment.
You never made a political comment. None of us are psychic.
In the future it may pay to post a warning and a reason for your post.
Not everyone on this site is an adult and can control the urge to press play.
I don't know you and I don't judge.I do wonder what motivates people to share this stuff on seabreeze. It dismays me that this stuff is available for anyone to watch.
Leave the guy alone.
His intentions weren't bad, it was clearly to show what a mixed up situation the world is actually in, and that these atrocities do happen.
That much is quite obvious, even for a semi intelligent person.
As for posting a warning.
The You tube title says it all one would think?
What part of, "2-year old female child ran over by car twice", don't you understand?
Baba, I watched that on the news yesterday & couldn't believe it either! The reporter said a "300lb Bengal tiger was shot with a tranq dart, but before the dart could take effect, it rushed the officers"...so they slaughtered every animal!?!
Very sad, you'd think they could work out a better way to contain them.
the Septics are born trigger-happy,part & parcel of their 1st Amendment - shoot first ask questions a year later apparently.![]()
Good post Flysurfer... I think it helps if people become aware of our trading partners society and how life works there.... life is cheap there.... just ask Apple who had loads of workers committing suicide in the ipod plants..... then look at the slaughter of animals to make fur on youtube....
There has been a big problem with hit and runs over there, some people even backing up over the person to finish the job because it would be too costly not too.... http://topics.scmp.com/news/china-news-watch/article/Perverse-logic-of-drivers-in-hit-and-runs
To be fair their society is catching up and evolving, but you don't know you're doing something wrong sometimes until someone else explains another "reasoning" on what you are doing...
^ RE: The Tigers, here's what somebody that doesn't critique from an armchair has to say:
abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2011/10/jack-hanna-on-zanesville-ohio-animals-we-would-have-had-carnage/
Ask a zoo, they are labelled as 'shot on site' if they escape. Apparently tranquillisers don't work so well on them.
Follow up on the China thing. Woman who came to rescue being accused of only in it for the money and fame:
the-diplomat.com/china-power/2011/10/20/chen-xianmei%E2%80%99s-tragedy/
RE: The Tigers again. I also noticed that anteaters are on the 'shoot to kill' list at zoos, if they escape, along with orang-utans, giraffes, lions, jaguars etc. etc..
...anteaters.
But apparently they are hardcore.http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/giant-anteater/