We knew this didn't we??

I don't think it matters one way or the other. Whatever sexuality she practices, it only affects herself, her sexual partners and perhaps her family. Perhaps someone who has suffered for their sexuality will make a better politician because they know what it is like to be persecuted by the state for who they are. Thus they may side more with personal freedom than state regulation and control.

Some of the worst dictators and mass murderers were loving fathers and fine family men. I'd rather have a sexual deviant as our country's political leader if he left us alone to get on with our lives than an upstanding family man who went to church on Sundays who expanded the state so all are part and dependent upon the state.

So Cisco, you overall position on this is "NO ****TERS, NO DYKES".......... Ahhh the lucky country.

The strangest rant.... little bit homophobic are we??? God fearing, all believing, rejecting others for being immoral if they have different opinions from you.

Reminds me of a Will Smith film I watched the other day... Have you ever had a wank in the shower? Have you ever had a homosexual thought? WTF has it got to do with you?

OK loggy. You have flushed me out so I will come out of the closet and admit it.

I am hetrosexual. Damn, I am so glad I have unloaded that guilt complex off my mind.

It is my bed, I made it and I am quite happy to lay in it.

The last great Labor leader that showed outstanding moral fortitude was John Curtin IMO when he defied the British Imperialists by bringing our troops home instead of letting them be sacrificed at Singapore.

Those since have evolved into a bunch of silver tails (see Aussie Bob and cheating Keating) until this last transmogrification into a red topped ranga who cares less about the people she is supposed to be leading than her political correct agenda.

I did have some hope when Rudd got in because he seems to be a stand up guy but he failed to recognise the snake that would later bite him.

The royal family might be reptillians but the ranga definitely is.

Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They should both be changed regularly, and for the same reason.

Sands, I'm not sure if your serious or your a fan of Simons but he has less factional support than Rudd. Rudd has 25 votes tops inside the parliamentary party and maybe more outside but the support just isn't there for a topple. Gillard has strong support across the factions and the feeling inside the party is that she can defeat Abbott in a contest for prime minister..... a very different thing from opinion polls. If and I say if there was a spill , and I just can't understand how there could be, then the party would go forward rather than backward, so you'd be looking at Smith, Combet(incredible cross factional support)and Wong(can you imagine that.... an unmarried, lesso, Asian with a child....Cisco's brain just exploded ). Lindsay Tanner where are you?

Playstation 3. and all I hope!