My old man who was a history lecturer at Rhodes university in Gatstad, put me onto questioning who built the pyramids and gave me a book that was very plausible but went way out of left field in terms of the lining up of the shafts with constellations.
They reckon they discovered a piece of timber up one of the shafts using a cable controlled vehicle that had a camera on it but the operation was shut down before they could get a drill up there to take a core sample and carbon date it.
They have since been roundly poohed poohed in circles that receive select artefacts and access.
The following link gives another fascinating look at the possibility that these guys were right and that they built by a global population from another era. I had a look at the slides first and then the interview.
Lots of very compelling evidence!
projectavalon.net/lang/en/klaus_dona_en.html
When are we going to admit that humans are clever and just cos it was 5,000 years ago they were not dumber than us.
We seem to think we are so advanced and clever and that way back when they must have been dopey and needed aliens to do it
I think you may enjoy watching this.. Part 1 of 4 if you're interested to look further
Dunno about the pyramids but in Collapse by Jared Diamond he talks about building the Easter Island statues.
There was all sorts of speculation about how they did it but nobody ever asked the surviving locals. Eventually they did and the explanation was "... get a shot load of people. Grab hold and heave." They then demonstrated it.
So my guess is that the pyramids were built by a heap of little brown guys with plenty of time on their hands. It's not that hard to imagine when the rulers thought they were immortal, they had a priest class with a vested interest in developing perpetual symbols of their power, and a reliable and stable economic and agricultural system.
why is everybody always so surprised and sceptical when its suggested that ancient peoples were capable of great feats of engineering or building?
ancient cultures developed much of the building priciples and mathematics we still use to this day. the romans built concrete structures far superior to anything today, ancient bridges and city walls still stand in asia, not to mention temples and churches.
the answer is simply that they were built using huge reserves of manpower and materials
the summerians (who predate egypt) had the knowledge of how to build pyramids and it is thought naval capabilities and celestial plotting as well as writing. they also had religion and gods and were the first civilisation to adopt town planning and architecture. it is thought that the summerians travelled across the globe and taught other cultures their knowledge and religions. i think there my be carving of summarians in temples from that period around the world.
the flood mentioned in the bible is said to be a direct copy of the sumarian flood stories.
eventually the summarians become the babalonians (no-one knows exactly why)and went on to become what we know as egyptian and then persian.
through that time the religions morphed from babalonian to egyptian and then onto christian/muslim. the stories were rewritten and the amount of gods varied until the christian version of one god.
there are some theories that freemasonry has a direct link to the egyptians
well that's my understanding anyways. could be off the mark in a few areas. so no conspiracy or aliens
My bet is the petermaccians were lead by their ruthless king Japie and his witch doctor sidekick with the feline face and strange round green headwear..
Possibly more relevant to the average person is - "Who left the brown spire on my front lawn!?"
Those pesky petermaciians walking their pet Anubis. [}:)]
and your pussy Women would become obsolete
How is it the Giza pyramids could still be standing today after thousands of years of earthquakes and decay?
"The mortar used is of an unknown origin. It has been analyzed and it's chemical composition is known but it can't be reproduced. It is stronger than the stone and still holding up today."
www.crystalinks.com/gpstats.html
Egyptians put hieroglyphics EVERYWHERE, but why were there none in the pyramids of Giza? You'd think if they made such a huge significant monument they would at least want people to know it was made by them.
So many things just don't add up at all. It's pretty obvious humans didn't make the pyramids with copper tools, anyone who believes that is a tool themselves. Use some logic and look past the disinformation you've been fed.
My dog crapped in a carpark a while back, on the top floor. A great big steaming pile of processed Eukanuba. I put it into a bag but a bit of the fourteen year old came out in me and instead of binning it I wound it up and let go.
It flew across the street on a downward ark and landed on the second story window sill of a dentist on the other side of the road.
I have never had the guts to go over and ask what happened when it was discovered. I was quite disappointed when it was removed after a few weeks.
I have always wondered where they thought it came from and what sort of decay it was in and whether they did the right thing and put it in the bin or just pushed it into the street for some poor unsuspecting dog hater to tread in.
It's those small things that help us keep our sanity
Just off the poo topic fpr a second japie, I just read about the underwater pyramids in Japan.
Interesting how they are man made but some people think they are natural formations, I can tell just by looking at them that someone had to build them.
Just goes to show there are PM33s everywhere
if they are wrong!
Amway,
Think of the pretend friends they would of contacted, and shampoo they would have had to move to build those bastards. They are truely wonders of the world, pre facebook.
