Read my long post on about P2 - second last post on the page
Won't post it again as it is huge
And no, it is not perception of crims, FFS somebody else mentioned that also as they just can't believe the big bad US is so far behind us in many areas.
I'd rather get robbed than shot.
Anybody else actually had a gun pointed at them in anger? I have and will never believe it's a good idea to increase the numbers of them out there.
EDIT:
I had a rifle barrel in right up my face and also against my head. It was surreal at the time and even freakier later (6 months) when i recalled that I nearly got my head blown off coz a customer in the shop went into 'auto pilot' and tried to walk out of the shop - freaking the speed/steriod junky out. He could have just twitched and it was game over for me.
So I am a crime victim and a gun victim but don't see any sense whatsoever in increasing the incidence of guns.
Hell, I think the average good citizen out there can barely be trusted to do up their own shoes, let alone drive. Why would I ever be tempted to encourage more gun ownership??
Just like cars, who is ever gonna say "Aww yeh, I'm a bit of an idiot so I really shouldn't operate a car/gun."
Instead of following the US down the self destructive path of high gun ownership (and worship), perhaps we should be allowing registered possesion of non-lethal protection such as capsicum spray. Cap spray is not entirely without flaws but obviously less fatal generally.
Switzerland has the highest per household gun ownership in the world (due to aforementioned national service) 6 million guns in 8 million houses was mentioned.
Why does it not have the highest murder rate?
Could it be social problems are the driving factor, not the accessability of tools that can do the job?
I still can't get my head around why you would want a potential tool of death in every household?
It's not like every household in the burbs has been burgled or every individual has been mugged, raped, asaulted.
Sure (depending on which skewed stats you subscribe to) the incidence of serious crime may be on the rise, but a proliferation of guns will seriously esculate the situation IMO.
Introduce a gun into a home invasion situation and the whole scenario ratchets up in danger - for ALL parties.
More guns out there in society would surely mean easier accessibility to guns for crooks too?
EDIT: Pretty bloody sketchy for coppers who turn up to the typical domestic/drug drama if there is a gun on premises. Suddenly it's looking like a hostage seige or in the heat of the moment, somebody copping a bullet instead of cap spray or a tingle time jolt.
GF I never said that everyone should have them - but I do believe the buyback was on false pretences, achieved nothing and took a lawfully owned item away from responsible people but not off the crooks.
If guns are so bad then the Govt's first action should be increasing the pathetic penalties for having an unlicensed firearm.
I know of a drug dealer, previously convicted of drugs and weapons charges, who was found with speed, lots of cash and a loaded revolver in his car. He got $500 fine for the gun.
That is disgusting.
All I'm saying is let the nice people have guns if they wish (make them well secured of course), and put the druggies and bikies in jail for a bl00dy long time when they are found with a gun.
The fact that nice people can have them is evidenced by the fact that we don't have cops or soldiers shooting each other when they have guns with them all the time.
We all have knives in our houses but we don't all stab people. But likewise, a $100 fine for a gang member carrying a knife outside a nightclub is disgusting.
Fair nuff.
However knives don't go off accidentally and are so ordinary that most kids don't find them interesting and want to play with them.. to their own fatal end.
As far as the buyback goes, nice folks could keep most of their weapons but had to register and keep them in an approved manner. That made perfect sense to me.
It may have been inconveniant for some, but hey - isn't everything in society such as vehicle licencing/road speed limits etc geared around the majority welfare not the minority?
As for automatic rifles, assault rifles and 'machine guns' well.. anyone wanting play Arnie on the weekend and having access to high powered or high repeating weaponary is totally tapped in the head as far as I'm concerned. Sure roo cullers etc are a very small niche that may be able to justify such weapons but an M16 in suburbia.. c'mon.
Gotta take the good with the bad in all legislation and ensuring safer storage and registration of weapons as well as ceasing the legal distribution of assault rifles has no doubt made the whole game safer - and most likelt stemmed the flow (but not ceased) of these weapons into the hands of crooks too.
Win - win.
Anyway.. this thread was called "It's time to carry guns".. and short of 120,000,000 Indos arriving armed in troopies on our shores it is never time to 'carry' guns IMO.
Cars & guns = deadly weapons. You need a licence for both.
When will we get driver education and IF guns were more available we would need more education for them and at the moment unless some one has more info we dont have any.
When I was young and living with Mum & Dad, Dad and most of his mates at the time had guns. Dad had a .22 Bretta semi auto and it was always kept at the house. We were taught about gun safety ect.
Its alot different today as peoples acces to guns isnt like it was in the 70s.
Forget Police, Lawyers, Judges.
I have never started a fight in my life. I live by two rules:-
1. forget pubic servants above they are useless, form & paper work fillers.
2. ***censored - leave to your imagination*****.
Other night in Sydney we had about 100 mostly sensible protesters
supporting Wiki Leaks guy. Radio reported over 70 police watching them.
I saw 2 gang bangers drive by in a $300K car past them, no
problem, no how could you afford this...nothing.
Shows you priorities of nasty government in this country.