You'll probably guess from the ignorance of the rest of this post but I'm no Aerospace Engineer. That said, there's seems to be no way of quantitatively describing the characteristics and performance of both kites and boards.
I understand that aerodynamics is very complex and still an area of research but is there not a way that a kite can be described mores systematically than, "it turns pretty fast" or relaunch is "easier than pulling Jessica Alba but harder than tying your shoelace"?
Thoughts?
For example, cars are rated by their fuel consumption, 0-100 time and top speed. Could there not be a some sort of standardised tests?
probably not. Like cars there is a huge difference in the feel of different models. I drive a landcruiser and I sure as hell didn't buy it for the fuel consumption or speed
Yeah but for a four wheel drive you'd use a different metric such as departure angle, ramp over or wheel articulation.
Some people are using quantitative measures.... ![]()
"This kite turns like a 7, but has the power of 14 and is like a 4 to pump up!"
just got myself a 2012 10m rebel. man what a kite! she's going in for a dyno next week ill let you know....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
thestick ![]()
Sorry to burst your bubble of joyous kite development..... if youve read a few posts on here, it will become very apparent that the same few people seem reply yay or nay to what they think is good/valid info followed by a whole bunch of dribble - easy marketing targets ![]()
So as far as getting a standard from kite companys - they just happen to market / make up all sorts of crap - to hype their gear for $$$ sales...
see the pattern formed.. ![]()
Let talk a walk down kite memory Lane ![]()
"Our new model has better bottom end, more Plop, fast turning and top end power than the previous model" what a load of CRAP
If the above were true, after 8+ years of any major kite company being in business - the kite should be able to pull you at a 1000mph, jump to the freakn Moon and do turning tricks faster than a prostitute ![]()
Sadly the good natured faith
you have will be better utilised in taking the so called Ferarri's (ooohhh
) of kites for demos before buying - to realise your actually riding a Hyundai Getz in drag
The more you Demo - the more the truth becomes 'Very' apparent... that there can be no standard ![]()
Until people are forced to take a lie detector before submitting reviews, all reviews are going to be 50% bull. the only thing you can probably accept is that is may be the best kite they've ever used because they came from an older kite which is likely to have worse performance, a stretched canopy etc.
Maybe after working this one out the same gurus can come up with a definitive way of scoring tricks in competitions......
... I seem to remember a few years ago some euro kite mag did some tests where they put a kite in the air and had it tied to the back of a ute with a pressure guage, then drove the ute at a constant speed (upwind) while a rider moved the bar in/out etc. I vaguely remember it was when the 'bow' kite revolution started and 100% depower was the key. Anyway, I think they some how measured power by the weight pressure that they got.
I like a nerd fest too and I would like to see some numbers. It might help chosing or narrowing down what kites you wanna try which can be difficult when you have limited access to other brands. And it might be for the fun of it too.
Smile factor can be brought into dispute when describing kites performance 'cause what is one mans love is anothers hate, 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' sort of stuff. I like lots of power with a bit of bar pressure on a twin tip, this could be a strapless surfers nightmare, so does that make the kite no good, bad or ugly (North still win on the ugly IMO).
Anyway, its all ment to be fun.
cheers for now,
Robbie![]()
There are just too many variables that come into play when testing a kites performance. User level, board, tide, choppy, gusty , to name a few.
Only when a completely stable environment is created, then this might be possible.
There was a thread some months ago about the topic:
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Kitesurfing/General/Kite-surface-area/
Many leading manufacturers still handle simple technical info (like surface area, projected area, aspect ration, drag / pull ratio, etc) as top secret, and some of them outright lie about even their kite sizes. They replace all that info with hype. I can understand this for a certain degree in a competitive industry. What is difficult to grasp why so many kiters have an aversion to the technical details and they rather go with the hype. They cannot demo 20-30 different kites in various conditions, so eventually they rely on a few honest reviews and the hype.
In response to the above thread only one manufacturer gave out their specs. This secrecy is unknown in other industries like mountain biking, trail biking, sports cars and so on, where transparency is favorable, and the riders like to know what they ride, not only feel it ![]()
it would be easy if performance was as cut and dried as a car or motorbike, the problem i see is skill. give one kite to 2 different riders and one loves it and the other thinks its so so, is it the kites fault?
generally no, most brands out there these days are decent to excellent. judging if a kite is right for you depends on how it feels for your style of riding.
The only quantatative measure that matters is GF.
Grin Factor.
For this we can use the grinfactometer.
Goes like this.
F@#$%Sh!t
i'm selling this peice of shiit right now!
Scowl
ggrr this kite is crappola.
Frown:
Hmm not feeling the love
Expressionless
kites ok but i'm abit bored. maybe i'm underpowered?
Smirk
Not bad... having abit of fun.
Grin
this fun... Nice!
FBG F@KN Big grin
yeah!
The wholey grail
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAArk yeah !whoot holla scream....
Now the trick is to correctly match the kite to the conditions.
you can very easily go from
to
juts by putting the wrong kite in teh sky for the conditions.....
my speed 3 gets a
for stupid jumps and glides but a
for wave riding. my reo is
in the waves but
for air time....
horses for courses.
i dont see how they could improve the 2012's non reversible turmie pipe connection to the differential girdle spring on the upper end of the grannies.. or what ever he said..