How about this for additional items to be added to the definition of a sailing vessel:
It must be able to maintain positive buoyancy whilst at rest, with the full complement of crew on board, with all crew members remaining above the waterline.
The "sail" must connect both directly to the hull of the vessel, and directly to a solid mast. The "sail" must not fly higher than the top of the mast.
To be eligible for a speed record, the vessel must be able to take off under its own power, from rest, and reach that speed.
This would disqualify kites, gliders, space shuttles re-entering from orbit, solar sails, and those ultra small speed sailboards.
Face it, L'Hydroptere is a freaking yacht. A kite is not a yacht, a 60L sailboard is not a yacht.
Nuff said .......... spinnakers are accepted looks pretty kite looking to me, load of crap the lot of it so typical.
I wonder how fast kiting could actually go if they even invested half as much coin as they did with yellowpages ?
a sail generates lift the centre board or fin stops the side way movement and a forward thrust is made , up wind sailing , ithink the kite does not generate thrust itj ust gets pulled along by the wind
A kite can point at least as high as a windsurfer without a centreboard can.
Works on the same principle. Instead of a fin, the base of the kite board is the lifting surface...
(it's still not sailing though
)
kites or sails don't generate thrust, they generate lift. the direction of lift determines the direction of force, which in conjunction with the direction and force of drag imposed by the board, determines the resultant movement of rider. now time for another beer
glider tow ropesare very stretchy,usually the stuff skiers use, it wouldstretch on initial take off.
How about a landyacht on a beach towing a skier in the water. it actually works, but weve never thought of it as the kid in the water being a sailor. actually got to 80kph doing it on Le Grande Beach ,Esperance
I kiter stands on a wakeboard/surfboard etc and is pulled along by a "thing" in the air. Kite/sail/foil/wind call it what you like.... but they are pulled along by it. The THING in the air is powered by wind.
If kitesurfing was to count in a sailing speed comp then so must every other THING that is powered by wind and can pull a person along on a board. Like a guy waterskiing next to and slightly behind a land yacht which is on the beach. The land yacht is just a kite flown really low with some wheels on it hahahaha
Can Mr land yacht here on the forums tell me if he reckons he could do 60kn for 500m on really hard ground with 1" of water over it... without aquaplaning or loosing control?
If so he can tow me along on a trick ski (no fins) I'll be planing at 60kn, and it will be a record. Makes as much sense as kiting holding the record.
The ISAF decision is the correct and logical one.
The question is:
Why do they say that kiting is not sailing AFTER the world speed record was broken and not before?
Was it just to let the kitesurfing guys organizing their event and pay for the international judge and homologation? (of course, their record is accepted in kitesurfing class but the main point was the absolute world record obviously...)
ISAF or world sailing speed record council could have rejected kitesurfing like 10 years ago and there would be no issue about this record...
Conclusion: What do we think about ISAF?
USELESS???