Marvellous aint it ???
All of a sudden it's revealed that Julia's party has forked out $350K's to hush all this up AND the Pro has suddenly remembered she was elsewhere at the time ????
I say all Australians should stand behind their government, cause it's sure as hell not safe to stand in front of it...
independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/jacksonville-12-trouble-in-jacksonville,4206
Next installment. Kathy Jackson looking more and more dodgy by the minute, meanwhile she's being wined and dined by the liberal party elite.
The whole case against Thomson rests on her believability, she is at the core of the Fair Work Australia report against Thomson.
This and the Slipper case are both unravelling, looking worse and worse for the Libs as it comes out that both cases have been stage managed by them to try to bring down parliament. Mal Brough and and Channel 7 journo have been discovered as players in what is blatantly a revenge play against Slipper.
Meanwhile the *ahem* straight and fair press in this country (all 2 of them) have gone suspiciously silent on the whole matter.
Blahblahblahblahblah..............................just get rid of the idiots.
Even saw they were spruiking that oz has not had a recession since 1991....yeah well thats cause its been a lib governement. Most noticibly we have been it deficit last 3 years, go figure.
It was sarcasam Moby, Dave seems to forget that there is half a mill of missing union funds that Craig has failed to explain on numerous occasions. Just because Kathy Jackson is a crook too dosen't clear Thomson.
But if Kathy Jackson is the main witness and she is being shown as unreliable then how can Thomson be found guilty?
Can someone explain these new revelations to me, like I'm a five year old? All a bit hard to follow.
It's all quite simple really.
Kathy says he did, Craig says he didn't.
Chris Whine says he thinks he did, Wayne Duck says he thinks he didn't.
Tony Cock Jocks says he thinks he did, Julia Working Families says she's sure he didn't.
A hooker says he did. The same hooker says he didn't.
Kathy says he definitely did, Craig says he definitely didn't.
So that's it really.
What's hard to understand in that? 
If half of the stuff that Mr. Wicks has been on about on Independent Australia are right, then the Jacksons are going to the big house.
For sure its sour. Any pension I get will be the result of my superannuation contributions. However politicians for some reason are privilidged to get a guaranteed income if they stay in for two terms, ie somewhere around 6 years. Some don't even stay that long and can they take it easy for the rest of their life, collecting about $2500 a week for doing nothing.
Meanwhile they quibble over unemployed people getting a tenth of that amount.
i reckon stuff like he has been caught for happens all of the time. He was just the unlucky guy that got sprung. someone more senior had to ok his bills. other guys had to go with him. i have just given up getting mad about it
According to the articles linked above it does happen all the time. Different credit card, same brothel (and also groceries, hotels, yada yada).
Looks like the HSU is corrupt. All of this neither proves nor disproves Thomson's innocence.
